MCP benchmark and evaluation index
Buyers comparing MCP options rely on anecdotes. A maintained benchmark with methodology becomes the citation standard — and a lead engine.
Opportunity score
70
confidence 75%
Related stars · 7d
+350.1k
4 tracked repos · est.
Trend runway
33mo
estimated demand lifespan
Avg breakout odds
65%
7-day cohort probability
Score anatomy
Every factor, its weight and its normalized value — the score is the weighted sum, nothing else.
Demand trajectory — 90 days
+350.1k stars · 7dAggregate star velocity and momentum across the 4 repositories underlying this opportunity · estimated
Underlying repositories
The projects whose trajectories generate this opportunity.
| Repository | Score | Stars · 7d | Stage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| paperclipai/paperclip101.3k stars · TypeScript | 79 | 73Healthy | +5.5k | Saturated | |
| Panniantong/Agent-Reach96.8k stars · Python | 78 | 72Healthy | +12.2k | Breakout | |
| Graphify-Labs/graphify126.1k stars · Python | 78 | 65Healthy | +15.1k | Breakout | |
| morluto/rea191.5k stars · TypeScript | 77 | 78Healthy | +317.3k | Saturated |
90-day execution plan
Days 0–30
Ship the wedge
Build the smallest sellable slice of the data product and put it in front of teams already using paperclipai/paperclip.
Days 30–60
Prove willingness to pay
Convert the MCP community's attention (demand 78/100) into 3–5 design partners at founding-customer pricing under a sponsorship motion.
Days 60–90
Systematize distribution
Publish benchmark/comparison content targeting the topic's search demand and integrate into the ecosystems of the related repositories — the channel compounds while the trend has an estimated 33 months of runway.